Kyrie,
It is Zeus’ anathema on our epoch for the dynamism of our economies and the heresey of our
economic methods and policies that we should agonize between the Scylla of numismatic plethora
and the Charybdis of economic anemia. It is not my idiosyncrasy to the ironic or sarcastic but my
diagnosis would be that politicians are rather cryptoplethorists. Althought they emphatically
stigmatize numismatic plethora, they energize it through their tactics and practices. Our policies
shoyld be based more on economic and less political criteria.Our gnomon has to be a metron
between economic, strategic and philanthropic scopes. Political magic has always been
antieconomic. In an epoch chararacterized by monopolies, oligopolies, monopolies, oligopolies,
monopsonies, monopolistic antagonism and polymorfous inelasticities, our policies have to be more
orthological. But this shoyld not be metamorphosed into plethorophobia which is endemic among
academic economists.Numismastic symmetry should not hyper-antagonize economic acme. A
greater harmonization between the practices of the economic and numismatic archoms is basic.
Parallel to this, we have to syncronize and harmonize more and more our economic and
numismatic policies panethnically. These scopes are more practicable now, when the prognostics
of the political and economic and numismatic policies panethnically. The history of our didimous
organizations in this sphere has been didactic and their gnostic practices will always be a tonic to
the polyonymous and idiomorphous ethnical economies. The genesis of the organization will
dynamize these policies. Therfore, I sympathize althoyght not without criticism on one or two
themes, with the apostles and the ierarchy of our organizations in their zeal to program orthodox
economic and numismatic policies.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου